IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/asae11/290611.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding knowledge, attitude, perceptions, and practices for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza risks and management options among Indonesian small-scale poultry producers

Author

Listed:
  • Tiongco, Marites
  • Narrod, Clare
  • Kobayashi, Mimako
  • Scott, Rosemarie
  • Nuryartono, Nunung

Abstract

This study examined socio-economic and behavioural factors affecting small-scale poultry producers‘ knowledge about HPAI symptoms (knowledge KAP), attitudes about safe practices handling poultry and products (attitudes KAP), perception on disease risk transmission (perception KAP), and how these knowledge, attitude, perceptions, and practices (KAPs) affect actual biosecurity practices. Empirical analysis is based on a survey data collected in 2009 in Kulon Progo, Yogyakarta from 700 households. The important factors that contribute to higher level of knowledge about HPAI symptoms are higher education level of household head (particularly for those producers with more than 13 years of education), if had poultry disease in the past 5 years as they learn through experience, and households from villages where outbreaks occurred. Moreover, those producers with higher knowledge about HPAI symptoms are more likely to believe in good practices about handling poultry and poultry products and are found to have higher concerns about disease spread risks. It is possible that poultry is important for these producers so they tend to have higher incentives to form correct attitudes and to be aware about good practices. In terms of the role of knowledge, attitudes, and perception about disease and disease risks in actual decisions regarding biosecurity practices, we find that KAP indices are not significantly associated with actual biosecurity decisions of the Yogyakarta poultry producers. This implies that there is some disconnect between the formation of knowledge, attitudes, and perception about disease and disease risks and the biosecurity practices that the producers actually adopt. We also find that adoption of biosecurity actions depends on flock size, so smaller and poorer producers adopt fewer biosecurity actions, thus they are considered to be riskier in terms of transmission risks. In addition, the biosecurity levels and probability are lower in villages that have had suspected or confirmed cases of HPAI. It is possible that producers lower their perceptions about the effectiveness of biosecurity measures when faced with actual HPAI outbreak in the village. It is therefore important to understand this disconnect in designing education awareness programs that would effectively explain the symptoms of HPAI and the health consequences it poses to both animals and humans, and how the disease can be prevented and controlled from spreading.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiongco, Marites & Narrod, Clare & Kobayashi, Mimako & Scott, Rosemarie & Nuryartono, Nunung, 2011. "Understanding knowledge, attitude, perceptions, and practices for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza risks and management options among Indonesian small-scale poultry producers," 2011 ASAE 7th International Conference, October 13-15, Hanoi, Vietnam 290611, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asae11:290611
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.290611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290611/files/session3_p22_Nunung%20Nuryartono_Indonesia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.290611?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asae11:290611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.