IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aeas18/284788.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumer perception and preference between broiler and indigenous chicken meat in Limpopo Province, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Mantsho, S.
  • Hlongwane, J.

Abstract

The paper's aim was to investigate Consumer perception and preference between broiler and indigenous chicken meat in Limpopo Province, South Africa. In this purpose 216 individuals participated to a questionnaire based survey in Mankweng Township. Factor analysis and chi square analysis was used to analyse the consumers' perceptions towards broilers and indigenous chicken meat. Cronbach alpha value was used to study the properties of measurement scales. The results pointed out an increased study found that where 53% of respondent prefers broiler chicken meat while 47% prefers indigenous chicken meat. Most of persons used to buy meat from supermarket (65%), being advantaged to purchase more food and goods at one way saving time. About 18% persons used to buy meat from hypermarket, 11% from street vendors, 4% produce their chicken meat for consumption and 2% buy from farm gate. Food choice questionnaire highlight that preference of food items is divided into ten categories which are health, mood, convenience, sensory appeal, natural content, price, familiarity and ethical concern. The Cronbach's alpha for this research is 0.748, where number of Cases = 216 and number of Items = 15. So, the research is an acceptable one. With this analysis, the first question of the compare and analyse the influence of consumers' preference between broiler and indigenous chicken meat. Therefore, all factors are acceptably important for consumers' preference and perceptions. Key word: Chronbach alpha, preference, perception

Suggested Citation

  • Mantsho, S. & Hlongwane, J., 2018. "Consumer perception and preference between broiler and indigenous chicken meat in Limpopo Province, South Africa," 2018 Annual Conference, September 25-27, Cape Town, South Africa 284788, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aeas18:284788
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.284788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/284788/files/0098.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.284788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aeas18:284788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.