IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aeas18/284752.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Livelihood Diversification and Poverty Among Rural Households in the Capricorn District, Limpopo, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Maja, T.
  • Oluwatayo, I.

Abstract

Livelihood diversification has become the backbone for many of the households in rural areas of South Africa and it is perceived as a strategy to cope with the growing population and the rapidly increasing poverty rate. A sizeable number of rural households in South Africa combine two or more jobs to generate more income as possible to enhance their poverty status. Therefore this study was conducted to examine the nexus between poverty and diversification of livelihoods and to ascertain whether the different livelihood diversification strategies engaged in make rural households better-off or worse-off in the study area. A multi-stage and simple random sampling technique was employed to collect data from a sample of 216 respondents. Analytical techniques employed were descriptive statistics, FGT poverty index and the probit regression model. Eight variables were included as explanatory variables in the probit regression and only five variables (gender of the household head, marital status of the household head, years of formal education, household size and member of association) were found to be significant at 10%, 5%, 1%, 1% and 1% respectively. Based on the findings, the study recommends that diversification of livelihood strategies needs to be strengthened among rural household, investment in formal and vocational training should be intensified to increase rural household�s participation in more viable livelihood options in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Maja, T. & Oluwatayo, I., 2018. "Livelihood Diversification and Poverty Among Rural Households in the Capricorn District, Limpopo, South Africa," 2018 Annual Conference, September 25-27, Cape Town, South Africa 284752, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aeas18:284752
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.284752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/284752/files/0040.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.284752?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kenneth Ofori‐Boateng & Samuel Adams & Williams Ohemeng, 2020. "Coping Strategies of the Urban Poor: A Case Study From Ghana," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 236-254, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aeas18:284752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.