IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare01/125636.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Alternative Approach to Measure Regional Comparative Advantage in China’s Grain Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Funing, Zhong
  • Zhigang, Xu
  • Longbo, Fu

Abstract

Domestic Resource Costs (DRC) are widely used to measure comparative advantages in production of any commodity in a country. Basically, the DRC measures the opportunity costs of producing specified goods with reference to border prices for both inputs, especially imported and/or tradable, and outputs. Once a foreign exchange rate is chosen, a Domestic Resource Costs Coefficient (DRCC) can be obtained by dividing the DRC with the exchange rate. If the value of DRCC equals one, then the opportunity costs of domestic production is exactly the same as the costs of imports, or the foreign currency earned from exports. If that value is less than one, it implies that domestic production costs are less than imports. However, there is a departure from classical Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage in the above approach. A Ricardian model requires comparing production of two goods between two countries, without counting domestic output prices and exchange rate. A country may have DRCC values higher than one for two or more products, which means it has comparative disadvantages in all these produts. However, it must have comparative advantage in at least one product. The same argument applies to measuring regional comparative advantages within a country. Therefore, in this study, the ranks, i.e., the relative values, rather than the absolute values, of DRCCs of will be taken as indicators of regional comparative advantages in grain production among provinces in China. The ranks of the DRCCs of various grain crops within any specific province, which suggest the relative comparative advantages in producing various grain crops in a province, rather than the relative comparative advantages of various provinces in producing a specific grain crop will be used to show the direction of structural adjustment. Obviously the two indicators are both important in measuring China’s regional comparative advantages in grain production, and a province’s comparative advantages in producing various crops may be more important in determining the direction of structural adjustment in that province.

Suggested Citation

  • Funing, Zhong & Zhigang, Xu & Longbo, Fu, 2001. "An Alternative Approach to Measure Regional Comparative Advantage in China’s Grain Sector," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 125636, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare01:125636
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.125636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/125636/files/Funing.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.125636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare01:125636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.