IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea16/236068.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Random-parameter PSM: a novel method of program evaluation for situations when participation is affected by unobservable variables

Author

Listed:
  • Takahashi, Taro
  • Nakajima, Toru
  • Matsutaka, Daiki
  • Dwyer, Janet

Abstract

Propensity score matching (PSM) is the most widely used method of program evaluation in situations when only cross-sectional data are available. PSM matches each participant in the program with a group of non-participants who were equally likely to participate in the program as the participant but chose not to participate. A well-acknowledged weakness of PSM is that its matching procedure is carried out solely based on observable variables, and therefore the resultant propensity score is biased if any unobservable variable plays part in people’s decision whether or not to participate. Here, we show through a simulation analysis that the application of a random-parameter probability model reduces the aforementioned bias, and that this method can be used as an easily implementable alternative to the standard PSM procedures. This bias reduction is attributable to the model's capability to assign a separate estimator for each individual, which can partially "absorb" the effect of the individual's unobservable traits on the participation decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Takahashi, Taro & Nakajima, Toru & Matsutaka, Daiki & Dwyer, Janet, 2016. "Random-parameter PSM: a novel method of program evaluation for situations when participation is affected by unobservable variables," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236068, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:236068
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.236068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/236068/files/AAEA_2016_Takahashi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.236068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:236068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.