IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea16/235923.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Costly Inspections and Little Abatement: An Evaluation of I/M Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Giguere, Chris

Abstract

Automobile emissions inspection and maintenance (I/M) programs are used by 31 states and Washington D.C. as well as a number of foreign counties to maintain or improve ambient air quality. Past literature provides evidence that the current design of most programs in the United States is ineffective. The efficiency of these programs, however, has yet to be analyzed. I fill a considerable gap in the literature by developing a comprehensive estimation framework to evaluate the efficiency of I/M. I use data from the North Carolina I/M program between 1999 and 2013 to estimate seven e m p i r i c a l m o d e l s r e q u i r e d b y t h e f r a m e w o r k . T h e c o s t s a n d b e n e f i t s f r o m b o t h I / M i n d u c e d r e p a i r s a n d s c r a p p a g e a r e t h e n c a l c u l a t e d f o r v a r i o u s r e g i m e s u s i n g d i f f e r e n t i n s p e c t i o n f r e q u e n c i e s a n d automobile exemptions. My results indicate that the North Carolina I/M program, as it existed between 1999 and 2013 was inefficient. The estimated mean benefits, costs, and net benefits were $28.5, $73.0, and ­$44.5 per year respectively, in millions of June 2015 U.S. dollars. The recent increase in automobile exemptions (s elective automobile targeting) in North Carolina’s program is estimated to decrease benefits and costs by 11 and 49 percent. Thus net benefits will increase by 63 percent to ­$16.3 million per year. Further reductions to the scope of automobiles inspected are estimated to generate positive net benefits. For example, a regime that inspects only automobiles older than 5 years and are driven more than 20 thousand miles per year is estimated to generate net benefits of $2.13 million per year. These efficiency gains are possible because automobiles are selected for inspections based on where they sit on their emissions trajectory. Programs that fail to account for this “location” are estimated to inspect too many automobiles and yield negative net benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Giguere, Chris, 2016. "Costly Inspections and Little Abatement: An Evaluation of I/M Efficiency," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235923, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235923
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.235923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235923/files/Giguere_AAEA_JMP_NCIM_SAT_20160525.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.235923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.