IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea15/205307.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Mirage of Food Deserts: Disparities between Stated and Revealed Results

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Haoluan
  • Swallow, Brent M.
  • Qiu, Feng

Abstract

Increasing evidence indicates that the neighborhood food environment has become an important determinant of dietary behaviors in recent years (Giskes et al., 2010; Zenk et al., 2009). For example, a lower intake of fresh foods and nutrients (e.g., fruits and vegetables) may cause unhealthy meal patterns (Branca et al., 2007) and lead to adverse health outcomes (Lebel et al., 2009). A review of U.S. studies by Larson et al. (2009) and a case study of Detroit by Zenk et al. (2009) also show that residents who live near supermarkets are more likely to eat more fruits and vegetables, and have healthier diets compared with residents who live further from supermarkets. Identification of “food deserts”, which responds to the neighborhood food environment, has thus been broadly discussed in the existing literature in terms of access to fresh food (Alviola et al., 2013; Bonanno and Li, 2014; Wang et al., 2014). Studies have conceptualized a variety of methods to capture food desert research and fresh food access measures, and two broad approaches have been proposed. One approach is based on a geographic perspective that uses spatial analysis (e.g., calculate the minimum distance from a neighborhood to the nearest supermarket) and analyzes GIS (Geographic Information Systems) data on neighborhood characteristics (e.g., population density, median income). Associations between the neighborhood fresh food environment and socio-economic characteristics have been revealed (Wang et al., 2014). The second approach relies on individual or household data obtained from surveys (LeDoux and Vojnovic, 2014) and interviews (Freedman, 2009). Questions regarding shopping behaviors and constraints of food purchase or fresh food access have been stated through this method. However, the majority of current studies that use the GIS approach to identify food deserts comprise “aggregate” assessments and reveal information about study areas at the neighborhood level. While most research that base on either qualitative or quantitative surveys focus on “individual” level and state respondent’s perspective of the food environment. To our knowledge, no previous study has investigated residents’ perspective about food deserts, or specifically, whether they consider their neighborhoods to be food deserts, together with food deserts identified by the GIS approach. The objectives of this study are two-fold: Compare respondents’ perspective of the food desert issue relative to the GIS analysis that has been widely adopted; Explore the potential reasons for the disparity between stated (survey) and revealed (GIS analysis) results regarding food deserts.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Haoluan & Swallow, Brent M. & Qiu, Feng, 2015. "The Mirage of Food Deserts: Disparities between Stated and Revealed Results," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205307, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea15:205307
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.205307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/205307/files/AAEA2015_Poster_Haoluan_FD.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.205307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea15:205307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.