IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea12/124919.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Efficiency, Non-permanence and Additionality- A Study on Payment Systems to Carbon Sequestration

Author

Listed:
  • Tian, Xiaohui

Abstract

This paper seeks to understand the mechanisms underlying the policies creating incentives for carbon sequestration. The key difficulty in designing carbon policies for forests is to take into account the ephemeral nature of carbon sequestration and to accurately track the carbon flow entering and exiting forests. Among a number of existing payment systems, carbon subsidy-tax system (CST) and carbon rental system are the only two systems which both consider nonpermanence and accurately track the forest carbon flow. In this paper, we derive the optimal conditions for harvests under various carbon policies and simulate the effects in a single region, multi age class timber market model. We find that carbon policy will encourage afforestation if it create additional revenue but the CST and carbon rental system are more effective than the others in extending rotation ages. Another finding is that costs of carbon rental system are much higher than that of CST system although they are efficiently equivalent.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian, Xiaohui, 2012. "Efficiency, Non-permanence and Additionality- A Study on Payment Systems to Carbon Sequestration," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124919, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea12:124919
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.124919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/124919/files/Tian.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.124919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea12:124919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.