This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Externalities of Conventional and Organic Pest Management: When Do Gains to Cooperation Exist?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Grogan, Kelly
Abstract

During the 1990s, demand for organic products increased on average by 20% each year. This growth in demand fueled growth in organic crop acreage. Between 1992 and 2005, organic cropland more than quadrupled, going from 403,400 acres to just over 1.7 million acres (USDA, 2008). Demand is predicted to increase annually by an additional 9 to 16% through 2010 (Dimitri and Oberholtzer, 2005). This further increase in demand will lead to an additional expansion of organic acreage, increasing the heterogeneity of agricultural regions and increasing the interaction that occurs between conventional and organic farms as they more frequently share the same regional landscape. Sharing the same landscape implies that they share pest and natural enemy populations. The movement of these organisms links farms within a region, potentially causing one grower’s pest control decisions to impact other growers. This paper examines these interactions. The analysis focuses on one organic and one conventional profit-maximizing grower. One pest and one natural enemy population connect the time periods in the model, and the movement of these populations connects the grower’s fields, creating a spatial-dynamic model. The analysis compares the privately optimal levels of pest control on the neighboring farms with the socially optimal levels of pest control. This comparison will illuminate situations when private decisions lower the region’s total profits via negative externalities created by the movement of insects. The model examines how these externalities differ under different population dynamics.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/49550
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Agricultural and Applied Economics Association in its series 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin with number 49550.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea09:49550

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
Phone: (414) 918-3190
Fax: (414) 276-3349
Email:
Web page: http://www.aaea.org
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (AgEcon Search).

Related research
Keywords: Crop Production/Industries;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Over five million full texts a year are downloaded through IDEAS.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-26.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.