IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaacem/52065.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

South Africa's Agriculture Policy Review

Author

Listed:
  • Polcyn, Tania
  • Vojtech, Václav

Abstract

South Africa has undergone enormous economic, social and political change since its democratization process began in 1994. This policy note provides a preview of key findings of the OECD's agricultural policy review for South Africa. Over the last 15 years, with the abolition of apartheid, South Africa has experienced fundamental change led by dramatic policy reforms aimed at creating a more open and market-oriented economy. As a part of the democratization process, the South African government has directed its macroeconomic policy towards stabilizing the economic environment, attaching high importance to the confidence of domestic entrepreneurs and the international community. South Africa defines its agricultural policy objectives in the context of broad economic reforms. The government's vision for the sector entails sustainable and profitable participation in the South African agricultural economy by all stakeholders. It recognises the importance of maintaining and developing commercial production and strengthening international competitiveness, and at the same time it stresses the need to address the historical legacies and biases of apartheid. Agricultural and rural development play a critical role in contributing to this broad economic growth and macroeconomic stability. Agriculture in South Africa is highly dualistic with a small number of commercial operations run predominately by white farmers and large numbers of subsistence farms run by black farmers. The dismantling of apartheid signified a strong commitment to develop a new class of black farmers and to integrate them into a market economy. Small holder farming, still located mostly in the former homelands, is an impoverished sector, dominated by low-input, labour-intensive production.

Suggested Citation

  • Polcyn, Tania & Vojtech, Václav, 2006. "South Africa's Agriculture Policy Review," Economic and Market Information 52065, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaacem:52065
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.52065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/52065/files/africa_f.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.52065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaacem:52065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agrgvca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.