IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afr/wpaper/afres2017_146.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing Compensation For Customary Property Rights In Malawi: The Case Of Mombera University Project

Author

Listed:
  • Lucky Kabanga

Abstract

Provision of public facilities and infrastructure in various sectors such as agriculture, mining, transport, education, and health among others requires a lot of land, which government usually expropriates as it may not have the appropriate land, or in appropriate quantities, or in appropriate locations. Compensation is normally required to cover consequential expropriatory losses occasioned to expropriated people. This paper aims to deepen our understanding of the applicability of market value as a basis for valuing customary property rights for compensation purposes during expropriation. By using the case of Mombera University project, this paper analyses how compensation is valued for customary property rights that are dominant in Malawi. The paper demonstrates that practically compensation for expropriating customary properties is generally inappropriate because market value, as a compensation valuation basis, and the methods used for its determination, are ill-equipped for customary properties. In this regard, the paper argues that prevailing assessment practices lead to inappropriate compensation for customary property rights in Malawi.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucky Kabanga, 2017. "Assessing Compensation For Customary Property Rights In Malawi: The Case Of Mombera University Project," AfRES afres2017_146, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2017_146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-afres-id-afres2017-146
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/system/files/afres2017_146.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Compensation; customary property rights; Expropriation; Market Value;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2017_146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.