IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afr/wpaper/afres2016_106.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Concept Of Marriage Value In Property Investment Valuation – Myth Or Reality

Author

Listed:
  • Bioye Tajudeen Aluko
  • Benjamin Gbolahan Ekemode
  • Daramola Thompson Olapade

Abstract

Where two real properties, either physically or legally, merged into one, the new one produces a higher value than the values of both when they are separately sold. The excess in value is known as marriage value (UK). This concept has been closely linked with “abutment value” or “enhancement value” (USA); and, at times, confused with “monopoly value” in the literature. Besides, its valuation had become a mirage in practice and requires careful thought of appropriate methodology that will capture value to be estimated. However, appraisal literature is filled with methodologies that hardly work in reality. Through interactions with focused groups of senior estate surveyors and valuers that had practiced for not less than two decades in Nigeria, the authors seek to develop more consistent and descriptive ways of handling marriage valuation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bioye Tajudeen Aluko & Benjamin Gbolahan Ekemode & Daramola Thompson Olapade, 2016. "The Concept Of Marriage Value In Property Investment Valuation – Myth Or Reality," AfRES afres2016_106, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2016_106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-afres-id-afres2016-106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/system/files/refereed-AfRES_2016%20proceedings-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    concept; estate surveyor and valuer; marriage value; Methodology; real property;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2016_106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.