IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afr/wpaper/afres2014_104.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Valuers Enlistment And Fees Standardization Practices In Nigeria Banking Industry: Implication For Real Estate Profession

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Adjekophori
  • Francis Okpaleke
  • DE Omorogieva
  • Jane I. Emeghe

Abstract

Recent development in Nigeria valuation market reveal that banks, notable end users of valuation services, now enlist (select) Estate surveying and valuation firms for credit based valuation jobs adopting divergent and unilaterally set basis. They also dictate fees payable to the retained Valuers adopting standardized threshold not properly aligned to the nature, purpose, location, magnitude of the job and sector fee scale. This study therefore, attempts an investigation into this enlistment and fee practices to ascertain the implication and the extent to which the act may affect the Estate Surveying and valuation profession in Nigeria. A survey was conducted in Lagos, using a purposive random sampling with a structured questionnaire to collect data from 121 respondents comprising 100 registered estate surveying firms and the 21 banks in Lagos metropolis. Data collected were captured with SPSS IBM Version 20 and analyses were done using descriptive and inferential statistics. The result however revealed that the enlistment policies are not broad based, criteria substantially opaque with a wide range of qualified practitioners excluded by this practice. It also creates black market fee structure, tight cost-fees ratio, creeping loss of interest by valuers in credit based valuations, low quality reports, and dwindled capacity of firms to engage and retain experienced valuers. It was further revealed that banks engage in this two-pronged practice predominantly as a cost saving strategy; to address mounting issues of connivance, compromise and corrupting influences; the need to promote retail/consumer banking and the unwieldy number/proliferation of valuation firms The study recommended amongst other remedial steps that despite the existing challenges,Valuers should uphold professional ethics by sustaining quality and professional standards while collectively avoiding undue soliciting for valuation briefs especially in unfriendly and tilted conditions, while upholding bidding professionally even in a competitive setting. Also the symbiotic nature of the relationship between banking and valuation sectors demand a proactive regulatory intervention by concerned regulators in order not to compromise the strategic risk management function of valuation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Adjekophori & Francis Okpaleke & DE Omorogieva & Jane I. Emeghe, 2014. "Valuers Enlistment And Fees Standardization Practices In Nigeria Banking Industry: Implication For Real Estate Profession," AfRES afres2014_104, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2014_104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-afres-id-afres2014-104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/system/files/afres2014-104.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Banking Industry; Enlistment; Fees Standardization; Real Estate Profession; Valuers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2014_104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.