IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afr/wpaper/afres2012_114.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contest in Governance-Local Government Bounderies and Traditional Authority Bounderies in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Cleotilda Nxumalo
  • Jennifer Whittal

Abstract

After democracy in 1994, South African underwent a period of reform in order to address inequalities and effect broad social change. As part of this, the Municipal Demarcation Board began demarcating local government boundaries in 1998. There was a lack of public participation by rural communities, and traditional communal lands were often split by municipal boundaries which failed to follow complex social boundaries followed by rural communities for centuries. A duality in governance of traditional areas was thus created and traditional authority and responsibility were severely affected. Contest between the state and traditional governance over land resulted in disputes and even violence (Maharaj, 2002). This research adopts a case study approach to investigate cases of disputes involving municipal boundaries and traditional authority. The causes of disputes are investigated and the processes of municipal demarcation and boundary dispute resolution are analysed against a number of frameworks such as those of good governance and performance measurement. From this critique improvements to the municipal demarcation processes are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Cleotilda Nxumalo & Jennifer Whittal, 2012. "Contest in Governance-Local Government Bounderies and Traditional Authority Bounderies in South Africa," AfRES afres2012_114, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2012_114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-afres-id-afres2012-114
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2012_114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.