Market Formation: Examining the Coordination of Heterogeneous Contributions
AbstractWhile extant literature recognizes the central role of collective action in market formation, it undertheorizes the existence of collective action dilemmas and their impact on successful market emergence. We redress this gap by examining the central mechanisms governing the existence and resolution of collective action dilemmas in market formation. We use a computational model that centers on actors’ collective development of a market infrastructure to explore the impact of different degrees of collaboration on market formation. In particular, consistent with market settings where actors tend to perform entirely distinct roles, we allow actors’ resource contributions to be imperfectly substitutable. We find that while heterogeneity in growth strategies strongly reduces market emergence thresholds under perfect substitution, this effect is strongly suppressed under imperfect substitutability. Most important, our analyses point to a market emergence conundrum: market success depends mostly on collaboration precisely where the foundation for its existence is lowest. We develop a set of propositions and a grounded typology of idealtypical instances of market formation. We discuss the implications of our findings for connecting collective action and market formation research.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies in its series DRUID Working Papers with number 12-05.
Date of creation: 2012
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.druid.dk/
Market formation; Collective action; Substitutability; Path-dependence; Simulation;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2012-12-10 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keld Laursen).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.