IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/entr19/207667.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Enhancing the Usefulness of Blockchain Technology in Finance Sector

In: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 12-14 September 2019

Author

Listed:
  • Juričić, Vedran
  • Radošević, Matea
  • Fuzul, Ena

Abstract

Blockchain technology has become widely popular with the appearance of cryptocurrencies that use the decentralized nature of blockchain in order to exchange funds between their users. In order to verify various needed details during an exchange, consensus mechanisms are used which solve simple but exhaustive calculations. Such operations fulfil their primary goal of verifying, but are a common target of public disapproval due to massive energy consumption and lack of usefulness. This work discusses different approaches and consensus mechanisms with a more useful secondary function, especially focusing on NP-complete problems as mediators in solving complex and resource-heavy problems. A new way of approaching these problems can benefit many areas, like science, healthcare, government and finance, optimizing the current infrastructure and business processes like markets, transactions, insurances, payments and supply chains, or creating more secure, reliable and efficient environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Juričić, Vedran & Radošević, Matea & Fuzul, Ena, 2019. "Enhancing the Usefulness of Blockchain Technology in Finance Sector," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2019), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 12-14 September 2019, pages 82-91, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:entr19:207667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/207667/1/11-ENT-2019-Juricic-et-al-82-91.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Rauchs & Garrick Hileman, 2010. "Global Blockchain Benchmarking Study," Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance Reports 201009-gbbs, Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Plinio Limata, 2020. "Blockchain and Institutions (I): trust and (de)centralization," CERBE Working Papers wpC35, CERBE Center for Relationship Banking and Economics.
    2. Bernhard Reinsberg & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "Blockchain Technology and International Relations: Decentralised Solutions To Foster Cooperation In An Anarchic World?," Working Papers wp508, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    3. Mario Arias-Oliva & Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez & Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo, 2021. "Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Factors Influencing the Use of Cryptocurrencies in Spanish Households," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Tröster, Bernhard, 2020. "Blockchain technologies for commodity value chains: The solution for more sustainability?," Briefing Papers 27, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    5. Martin Cimiterra & Jackie Krafft & Lionel Nesta, 2021. "Blockchain as Schumpeter Mark 1 or Mark 2? An empirical analysis of blockchain job offers in France and Germany [Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(6), pages 1388-1402.
    6. Mahtab Kouhizadeh & Joseph Sarkis, 2018. "Blockchain Practices, Potentials, and Perspectives in Greening Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Niloofar Etemadi & Pieter Van Gelder & Fernanda Strozzi, 2021. "An ISM Modeling of Barriers for Blockchain/Distributed Ledger Technology Adoption in Supply Chains towards Cybersecurity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2020. "Blockchain-Enabled Corporate Governance and Regulation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-41, June.
    9. Serrano-Calle, Silvia & Robles, Tomás & Martín, Diego & Mateos, Raquel, 2018. "Digitalization of Operations Management with Emotional and Intelligence Tools. Blockchain and IoT integration, the last disruption?," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184967, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    10. Claudia Antal & Tudor Cioara & Ionut Anghel & Marcel Antal & Ioan Salomie, 2021. "Distributed Ledger Technology Review and Decentralized Applications Development Guidelines," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, February.
    11. Samuel BRÃœLISAUER & Anastasia COSTANTINI & Gianluca PASTORELLI, 2020. "The Digital Social Economy - Managing and Leveraging Platforms and Blockchain for a People-Centred Digital Transformation," CIRIEC Working Papers 2011, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    12. Viktoria Rajnak & Thomas Puschmann, 2021. "The impact of blockchain on business models in banking," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 809-861, September.
    13. Emanuele Borgonovo & Stefano Caselli & Alessandra Cillo & Donato Masciandaro, 2018. "Between Cash, Deposit And Bitcoin: Would We Like A Central Bank Digital Currency? Money Demand And Experimental Economics," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 1875, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    14. Serrano-Calle, Silvia & Delarue, Erik, 2018. "Smart Technologies Applied to the Energy Sector. Renewable Energy Expansion Strengthened by Digital Communications and Distributed Ledger Technologies?," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184966, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    15. Emanuele Borgonovo & Stefano Caselli & Alessandra Cillo & Donato Masciandaro, 2017. "Beyond Bitcoin And Cash: Do We Like A Central Bank Digital Currency? A Financial And Political Economics Approach," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 1765, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    16. Viktoria Rajnak & Thomas Puschmann, 0. "The impact of blockchain on business models in banking," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-53.
    17. Bernhard Reinsberg & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "Blockchain Technology and the Governance of Foreign Aid," Working Papers wp505, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    18. Guendalina Capece & Nathan Levialdi Ghiron & Francesco Pasquale, 2020. "Blockchain Technology: Redefining Trust for Digital Certificates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-12, October.
    19. Oyebanjo Ogunlela & Ojugbele Olabode & Tengeh Robertson, 2021. "Blockchain technology as a panacea for procurement corruption in digital era," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 311-320, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    blockchain; proof of work; optimization; problem solving;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:entr19:207667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.entrenova.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.