IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/topchp/978-0-387-23196-9_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Anatomy of Institutional and Organizational Failure

In: Obtaining the Best from Regulation and Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Karl A. McDermott

    (NERA)

  • Carl R. Peterson

    (NERA)

Abstract

CONCLUSIONS We have attempted to show that regulatory failures are products of institution designs where rigidities in the ability of the institutions to adapt to shocks lead to profound disappointment in the public’s expectations. The politically sensitive character of these essential services makes them ripe for instant reform. Kahn (1988, p.xxxvii) has pointed out we really don’t have a choice between perfect markets and perfect regulation as he admonished the “…central institutional issue of public utility regulation” remains the one that I identified at that time- finding the best possible mix of inevitably imperfect regulation and inevitably imperfect competition.” In selecting new institutions we need to learn from the lessons past and present that care in the design and implementation is critical. In restructuring efforts around the world today we still find rhetoric prevailing over analysis. There are still those who say all we need are property rights and everything else will fall into place. If there is one lesson to be learned from our regulatory history it is that there are no simple solutions, no silver bullets and no quick fixes.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl A. McDermott & Carl R. Peterson, 2005. "The Anatomy of Institutional and Organizational Failure," Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy, in: Michel A. Crew & Michael A. Crew & Menahem Spiegel (ed.), Obtaining the Best from Regulation and Competition, chapter 0, pages 65-92, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:topchp:978-0-387-23196-9_4
    DOI: 10.1007/0-387-23196-X_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:topchp:978-0-387-23196-9_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.