IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/thechp/978-981-16-0428-7_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Equality, Priority, and Distributional Judgements

In: Social Values and Social Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • S. Subramanian

    (Independent Scholar)

Abstract

The present essay undertakes an assessment of the substantive significance of Derek Parfit’s distinction between Prioritarianism and Egalitarianism. In providing a brief critique of Parfit’s arguments, the essay draws on the author’s own earlier work and that of Thomas Christiano and Will Braynen, John Broome, and Marc Fleurbaey. It considers issues relating to the ‘Levelling Down Objection’, the ‘Divided World example’, and the distinction between ‘absolute’ and ‘relative’ valuations of individual benefit. It is contended that ‘levelling down’ presents a difficulty only for ‘Pure Telic Egalitarianism’, not for ‘Pluralist Telic Egalitarianism’; that one can have an Egalitarian rationalization for favouring equality in the distribution of a smaller sum of well-being over inequality in the distribution of a larger sum even in a ‘Divided World’; and that, while a particular ‘absolute’/‘relative’ dichotomy is relevant for a particular ‘distribution-invariance’/‘distribution-sensitivity’ dichotomy, the resulting distinction is useful for differentiating two types of Egalitarian rather than for differentiating a non-Egalitarian principle such as Prioritarianism from Egalitarianism.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Subramanian, 2021. "Equality, Priority, and Distributional Judgements," Themes in Economics, in: Social Values and Social Indicators, chapter 0, pages 57-70, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:thechp:978-981-16-0428-7_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-0428-7_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:thechp:978-981-16-0428-7_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.