IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/stpchp/978-3-030-14140-0_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Knowledge Asymmetry, Social Trust: Implications for Oversight

In: Anti-Corruption Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Merve Erdilmen

    (McGill University)

Abstract

This chapter presents some cross-country analysis regarding a central issue: the lack of knowledge between parliamentary and non-parliamentary actors. A nuanced understanding of the way corruption operates sheds light on the need for a comprehensive and coexisting relationship between the agency-based and institutionalist frameworks as well as the knowledge and trust-based sociological accounts for the corruption. The disparity between different actors’ opinion on the effectiveness of oversight bodies reminds us the significance of the accurate and trustable information regarding the oversight bodies when one wants to shed light for the relationship between parliamentary oversight and corruption. The lack of knowledge on the way parliament and oversight bodies work blocks the effectiveness of civil society organizations and journalists in curbing corruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Merve Erdilmen, 2020. "Knowledge Asymmetry, Social Trust: Implications for Oversight," Studies in Public Choice, in: Rick Stapenhurst & Rasheed Draman & Brooke Larson & Anthony Staddon (ed.), Anti-Corruption Evidence, chapter 0, pages 185-192, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-3-030-14140-0_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-14140-0_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-3-030-14140-0_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.