IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/stpchp/978-1-4614-5909-5_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Bioeconomics of Scout Bees Voting-with-the-Wings Using Less-Than-Unanimity Voting Rule: Can Bees Count, Quorum Sense, etc.?

In: Public Choice, Past and Present

Author

Listed:
  • Janet T. Landa

    (York University)

Abstract

Recent experimental findings by Thomas Seeley et al. (2006) found that the essence of group decision-making by scout bees is their use of a kind of “quorum-sensing” voting rule, rather than the unanimity rule (Martin Lindauer 1961) in arriving at their collective choice of the best new nest site. In light of the new experimental findings, this paper revises my earlier paper’s (Landa 1986) theoretical conclusion that the unanimity rule is the “best” rule for the scout bees’ collective choice of the best new nest site. A novelty in this paper is my hypothesis that bees, though unable to count, are able to “subitize” and hence able to sense when a collective decision by a quorum of scout bees has been reached.

Suggested Citation

  • Janet T. Landa, 2013. "The Bioeconomics of Scout Bees Voting-with-the-Wings Using Less-Than-Unanimity Voting Rule: Can Bees Count, Quorum Sense, etc.?," Studies in Public Choice, in: Dwight R. Lee (ed.), Public Choice, Past and Present, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 89-99, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-1-4614-5909-5_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5909-5_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-1-4614-5909-5_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.