IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/stpchp/978-1-4614-5909-5_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Public Choice Revolution and Principles of Economics Texts

In: Public Choice, Past and Present

Author

Listed:
  • James Gwartney

    (Florida State University)

Abstract

Following the publication of The Calculus of Consentin 1962, a new school of thought began to exert an impact on the economics profession. These changing winds are sometimes referred to as the “public choice revolution.” They eventually led to the awarding of the 1986 Nobel Prize to James Buchanan for his pathbreaking work in this area. Both Buchanan and the public choice literature exerted a major impact on my career and approach to economics. In essence, public choice applies the tools of economics to both the market and political processes. Without having knowledge about the operation of both, one is in a poor position to understand how alternative institutions and policies will affect outcomes. This comparative approach seemed so obvious to me, I incorporated it into my teaching of introductory economics in the early 1970s. Soon thereafter, I integrated the approach into a principles of economics text, Economics: Private and Public Choice.First published in 1976, this text is now in its 14th edition. Even though the book has been successful, I am nonetheless, disappointed that public choice has not exerted more impact on principles courses. Most introductory classes and texts continue to treat government as if it were an omniscient, benevolent dictator. Correspondingly, rather than analyzing how both markets and collective decision-making handle economic problems, most of the profession continues to focus on market failure, ideal solutions under restrictive assumptions, and the modeling of government as if it were a corrective device. This approach, which is particularly dominant at elite schools, undermines both the relevance and usefulness of economics. It is misleading and leaves students with a false, romantic view of government and the operation of the democratic political process. Thus, public choice analysis and the work of scholars like Buchanan and Tullock are just as relevant today as they were four decades ago. Hopefully, a new generation of economists will grasp this point and take the public choice revolution to new heights.

Suggested Citation

  • James Gwartney, 2013. "The Public Choice Revolution and Principles of Economics Texts," Studies in Public Choice, in: Dwight R. Lee (ed.), Public Choice, Past and Present, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 185-194, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-1-4614-5909-5_13
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5909-5_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pál Czeglédi, 2022. "Why does the confidence in companies, but not the confidence in the government, affect the demand for regulation differently across countries?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 211-231, December.
    2. Marek Wigier, 2015. "Results of Support for Agriculture during the CAP Implementation in Poland," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 134-144, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-1-4614-5909-5_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.