IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/stechp/978-981-10-3752-8_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Quality as a Moving Target: Japanese Tea, Consumer Preference, and Federal Regulation on the US Market

In: Imitation, Counterfeiting and the Quality of Goods in Modern Asian History

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Hellyer

    (Wake Forest University)

Abstract

In the 1860s, US consumers initially welcomed the first imports of Japanese green tea, viewing them as superior in qualityQuality to established Chinese varieties. Two decades later, however, Japanese tea faced a crisis amid rising concerns about its quality. This chapter explores first the reasons behind that crisis, highlighting the roles of rapidly changing consumer views of coloring agents added to teasColoring agents added to tea , health movementsHealth movements , media reports of widespread adulterationsAdulteration , and negative advertising campaigns launched by promoters of rival India and Ceylon black teas. Second, it examines the response mounted by US merchants dealing in Japanese green tea, emphasizing how they championed the institution of federal standards of quality, imposed by the US Congress in 1883 and 1897. The chapter thus reveals the limited influence that Japanese producers played in shaping perceptions of qualityQuality for their product, stressing instead the impacts of US discourse concerning food and beverage adulterationAdulteration and fluid consumer preferencesConsumer preferences for tea.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Hellyer, 2017. "Quality as a Moving Target: Japanese Tea, Consumer Preference, and Federal Regulation on the US Market," Studies in Economic History, in: Kazuko Furuta & Linda Grove (ed.), Imitation, Counterfeiting and the Quality of Goods in Modern Asian History, chapter 0, pages 93-106, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stechp:978-981-10-3752-8_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3752-8_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stechp:978-981-10-3752-8_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.