IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/stcchp/978-3-031-24954-9_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Exploring Alternative Ways to Allocate Delegates

In: Delegate Apportionment in the US Presidential Primaries

Author

Listed:
  • Michael A. Jones

    (American Mathematical Society)

  • David McCune

    (William Jewell College)

  • Jennifer M. Wilson

    (Eugene Lang College, The New School)

Abstract

This chapter explores alternate models for allocating delegatesDelegate to candidates. We review shift-quota and divisor methodsDivisor methods and different criteria for determining which allocation is fairest, including the seat-transfer approach and optimization. We compare these methods to delegate apportionment methods based on two indices of disproportionality. We also discuss how the apportionment problem has been solved in the European UnionEuropean Union Parliament using the concept of degressive proportionalityDegressive proportionality, and use this concept to motivate the idea of regressive proportionalityRegressive proportionality. This mirror image of degressive proportionalityDegressive proportionality, used in conjunction with divisor methodsDivisor methods, offers a potential solution to the delegateDelegate apportionment problem which avoids some of the inconsistency and paradoxical behavior exhibited by existing delegate allocation methods. We conclude by discussing the factors that make delegate apportionment unique, and how the apportionment methods used by each state could be better tailored to where the election falls in the primaryPrimary calendar.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael A. Jones & David McCune & Jennifer M. Wilson, 2023. "Exploring Alternative Ways to Allocate Delegates," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Delegate Apportionment in the US Presidential Primaries, chapter 0, pages 187-206, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-031-24954-9_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24954-9_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-031-24954-9_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.