IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/stcchp/978-3-031-21696-1_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Analyzing the Zerkani Network with the Owen Value

In: Advances in Collective Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Encarnación Algaba

    (Matemática Aplicada II and Instituto de Matemáticas de la Universidad de Sevilla)

  • Andrea Prieto

    (Matemática Aplicada II, Escuela Superior de Ingenieros, Camino de los Descubrimientos)

  • Alejandro Saavedra-Nieves

    (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela)

  • Herbert Hamers

    (Tilburg University)

Abstract

This paper introduces a new centrality measure based on the Owen value to rank members in covert networks. In particular, we consider the Zerkani network responsible for the Paris attack of November 2015 and the Brussels attack of March 2016. We follow the line of research introduced in Hamers et al. [Handbook of the Shapley value. Taylor and Francis Group: CRC Press, pp 463–481 (2019)]. First, we consider two different appropriate cooperative games defined on the Zerkani network. Both games take into account the strengths of the links between its members and the individual contribution of its members. Second, for each game the Owen value is calculated, that provides a ranking of the members in the Zerkani network. For this calculation, we need to create a suitable partition of the members in the network, and, subsequently, we will use the approximation method introduced in Saavedra-Nieves et al. [The mathematics of the uncertain: A tribute to Pedro Gil. Springer, pp 347–356 (2018)]. Moreover, we can provide specific error bounds for the approximation of the Owen value. Finally, the obtained rankings are compared to the rankings established in Hamers et al. [Handbook of the Shapley value. Taylor and Francis Group: CRC Press, pp 463–481 (2019)].

Suggested Citation

  • Encarnación Algaba & Andrea Prieto & Alejandro Saavedra-Nieves & Herbert Hamers, 2023. "Analyzing the Zerkani Network with the Owen Value," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Sascha Kurz & Nicola Maaser & Alexander Mayer (ed.), Advances in Collective Decision Making, pages 225-242, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-031-21696-1_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-21696-1_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-031-21696-1_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.