IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-99-2329-8_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Trade in Services and Mutual Recognition of Professional Qualifications in the EU and International Systems: Multilateralism à la Carte?

In: The European Union and the Evolving Architectures of International Economic Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Boscarato

    (Trade Policy Professional, Australia-EU FTA Negotiations)

Abstract

At the multilateral level, the General Agreement on Trade in Services (‘GATS’) seeks to create a competitive playing field for international trade services just as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (‘GATT’) does for goods. However, the liberalisation of services does not simply rely on removing barriers at the border, but requires much deeper efforts at smoothing out behind-the-border technical barriers. Mutual Recognition Agreements (‘MRAs’) for professional qualifications are an important enabling framework that help to liberalise international trade in services. However, very few provisions of World Trade Organisation (‘WTO’) agreements deal with such mutual recognition frameworks. For this reason, regulation is mostly found in bilateral and regional preferential free trade agreements (‘FTAs’), with the notable exceptions of the EU and the Australia-New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement (‘ANZCERTA’) frameworks. The EU has been engaged in separate FTA negotiations with Australia and New Zealand for the last few years, with the former now reaching its conclusion, and the latter inked in June 2022. Both the European Union (‘EU’) and ANZCERTA having very ambitious and far-reaching frameworks for the recognition of professional qualifications, it may be expected that similarly ambitious provisions might be struck in the context of their FTA negotiations. While this does not appear to be the case, this contribution examines these negotiations, and the parallel negotiations each of these parties have with the United Kingdom, as useful examples to contrast different approaches to the recognition of professional services, and explore what a broader professional qualifications recognition framework may look like in the future—how is regulation evolving in areas such as accountancy, health and legal services, and what, if any, is the impact of the divide between common law and civil law countries on the mutual recognition of qualifications?

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Boscarato, 2023. "Trade in Services and Mutual Recognition of Professional Qualifications in the EU and International Systems: Multilateralism à la Carte?," Springer Books, in: Ottavio Quirico & Katarzyna Kwapisz Williams (ed.), The European Union and the Evolving Architectures of International Economic Agreements, chapter 0, pages 133-152, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-99-2329-8_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-2329-8_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-99-2329-8_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.