IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-642-02851-9_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Structuring the decision problem

In: Rational Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Franz Eisenführ
  • Martin Weber

    (University of Mannheim)

  • Thomas Langer

    (University of Münster)

Abstract

Summary The basic structure of a decision problem entails alternatives, uncertainties, consequences of alternatives and uncertainties, as well as the objectives and preferences of the decision maker. Important decisions on the relevant alternatives have to be made in advance. They refer to such questions as: Should further alternatives be considered or should a choice be made from the existing ones? Should the number of existing alternatives be reduced by merging similar alternatives or increased by splitting existing alternatives into several variants? Should the options be designed as one-stage or multi-stage alternatives? Other important preceding decisions relate to the modeling of uncertainties. Can the future be predicted sufficiently well to neglect uncertainties in general? If not, what are the relevant uncertainties that influence the outcomes of the decision problem? In how much detail or how general should the universe of possible states be modeled? Uncertainty is described by states or events to which probabilities are allocated. Probabilities have to obey certain rules: joint probabilities and conditional probabilities are relevant to combining uncertain events. These combinations can be visualized by the use of event trees or cause trees. If an alternative is chosen and uncertainty resolved, a certain consequence will be obtained in a deterministic fashion. It might be necessary to formulate an effect model that determines the consequences. When modeling the preferences, a preliminary decision has to be made on whether a single objective or several objectives should be considered. The relevant objectives have to be identified. In the case of uncertain expectations, risk attitude has to be considered, and in case of consequences that occur at different points in time, it might be reasonable to model time preference. Usually, it is not possible to model the different components of the decision problem independently of one another. The components influence each other. The decision maker moves back and forth between the set of alternatives, the uncertainty structure and his model of preferences until he finishes modeling the decision problem and derives the optimal decision. Graphical forms of representation such as the influence diagram, the decision matrix, and the decision tree are very useful tools. They force the decision maker to clarify his conceptions and support him in communicating with and explaining the decision fundamentals to other people involved in the decision process.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz Eisenführ & Martin Weber & Thomas Langer, 2010. "Structuring the decision problem," Springer Books, in: Rational Decision Making, chapter 0, pages 19-58, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-02851-9_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02851-9_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-02851-9_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.