IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-540-93777-7_23.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The structure and the emergence of essential patents for standards: Lessons from three IT standards

In: Schumpeterian Perspectives on Innovation, Competition and Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Sadao Nagaoka

    (Hitotsubashi University)

  • Naotoshi Tsukada

    (Hitotsubashi University)

  • Tomoyuki Shimbo

    (Yamagata University)

Abstract

This paper examines the structure and the evolution of the patents judged as essential for three major recent technical standards in information technology (MPEG2, DVD and W-CDMA). We have found that these standards have many essential patents, which are owned by many firms with different interests. The number of essential patents has increased significantly over time since the standard was set. We identify three reasons for why the essential patents are many and increase over time: they cover a number of different technology fields, there exists R&D competition even in a narrowly defined technology field, and a firm can expand its patent portfolio by using continuation and the other practices based on the priority dates of its earlier filed patent applications in the USA. Around 40% of the essential US patents for MPEG2 and DVD standards have been obtained by using these applications. However, our analysis does not support the view that a firm with a pioneering patent can obtain more essential patents, using these practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadao Nagaoka & Naotoshi Tsukada & Tomoyuki Shimbo, 2009. "The structure and the emergence of essential patents for standards: Lessons from three IT standards," Springer Books, in: Uwe Cantner & Jean-Luc Gaffard & Lionel Nesta (ed.), Schumpeterian Perspectives on Innovation, Competition and Growth, pages 435-450, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-93777-7_23
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-93777-7_23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Josh Lerner & Jean Tirole, 2015. "Standard-Essential Patents," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 123(3), pages 547-586.
    2. Cesare Righi & Timothy Simcoe, 2022. "Patenting inventions or inventing patents? Continuation practice at the USPTO," Economics Working Papers 1820, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    3. Cesare Righi & Timothy Simcoe, 2022. "Patenting Inventions or Inventing Patents? Continuation Practice at the USPTO," Working Papers 1320, Barcelona School of Economics.
    4. TSUKADA Naotoshi & NAGAOKA Sadao, 2011. "Standards as a Knowledge Source for R&D: A first look at their incidence and impacts based on the inventor survey and patent bibliographic data," Discussion papers 11018, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    5. SHIMBO Tomoyuki & NAGAOKA Sadao & TSUKADA Naotoshi, 2015. "Dynamic Effects of Patent Pools: Evidence from inter-generational competition in optical disk industry," Discussion papers 15132, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Standard; Essential patent; Continuations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-93777-7_23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.