IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-540-87753-0_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Choice Based Conjoint Studies: Design and Analysis

In: Applied Conjoint Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Vithala R. Rao

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

One of the major objectives in conjoint analysis has been to predict the choices made by a sample of individuals for a new item which is described in terms of a set of attributes used in a conjoint study. Ratings-based conjoint studies involve the conversion of an individual’s stated utility for an item to predict the probability of choice of an alternative under various conditions (e.g. when other alternatives available). As described in Chap. 3 , such a prediction is made using preference data (ratings or rankings) collected on a set of hypothetical choice alternatives. A parallel stream of research pursues the path of choice experiments in which an individual makes a choice among a set of choice alternatives, each of which is typically described by a set of attributes; several choice sets are presented to each individual. These choice data, across all the choice sets and all individuals, are then analyzed using a choice model (usually a multinomial logit model and sometimes multinomial probit model) to obtain a function that relates the attribute levels to probability of choice. This approach has come to be known as choice-based conjoint analysis and has its roots in discrete choice analysis; these methods are also called “stated” choice methods (or stated choice experimental methods) because they represent intended choices of respondents among hypothetical choice possibilities. This chapter describes these methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Vithala R. Rao, 2014. "Choice Based Conjoint Studies: Design and Analysis," Springer Books, in: Applied Conjoint Analysis, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 127-183, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-87753-0_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87753-0_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandra König & Tabea Bonus & Jan Grippenkoven, 2018. "Analyzing Urban Residents’ Appraisal of Ridepooling Service Attributes with Conjoint Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-87753-0_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.