IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-540-26993-9_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Evaluating Credit Risk Models

In: Risk Management

Author

Listed:
  • Hergen Frerichs
  • Mark Wahrenburg

    (University of Frankfurt/Main)

Abstract

The problem how to evaluate and monitor the quality of credit risk models has recently received much attention. The discussions about the inclusion of internal models in the Basel Capital Accord highlight this fact. Basel II does not allow the use of full-scale credit portfolio risk models for regulatory capital calculation because regulators are concerned that model quality cannot be validated accurately enough. However, banks are allowed to use internal credit rating systems although it is by far not clear how accurately their quality may be evaluated. This paper discusses the current state-of-the-art concerning methods and empirical results for validating both credit portfolio risk models and internal credit rating systems. In order to allow for a meaningful assessment of the scope and limits of model validation we closely follow and compare our results to the existing literature on validating market risk models.

Suggested Citation

  • Hergen Frerichs & Mark Wahrenburg, 2005. "Evaluating Credit Risk Models," Springer Books, in: Michael Frenkel & Markus Rudolf & Ulrich Hommel (ed.), Risk Management, edition 0, pages 219-238, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-26993-9_11
    DOI: 10.1007/3-540-26993-2_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-26993-9_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.