IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-319-09785-5_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Myths, Challenges, Risks and Opportunities in Evaluating and Supporting Scientific Research

In: Incentives and Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Quack

    (Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich)

Abstract

We summarize and discuss critically the various procedures used for decisions in evaluating and funding scientific research in view of the goal of obtaining the best research with a given funding volume. Merits, difficulties, and problems in some procedures are outlined. We identify a number of myths appearing frequently in the process of research evaluation. We indicate some similarities in deciding on funding research projects, making appointments to academic and leading research positions and selecting prize winners for high prizes for scientists. Challenges, risks and opportunities in research and its funding are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Quack, 2015. "Myths, Challenges, Risks and Opportunities in Evaluating and Supporting Scientific Research," Springer Books, in: Isabell M. Welpe & Jutta Wollersheim & Stefanie Ringelhan & Margit Osterloh (ed.), Incentives and Performance, edition 127, pages 223-239, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-09785-5_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-09785-5_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.