IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-25998-2_45.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Post-harvest Losses of Coconut in Abura/asebu/kwamankese District, Central Region, Ghana

In: Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • E. Baffour-Awuah

    (University of Cape Coast
    Cape Coast Technical University)

  • N. Y. S. Sarpong

    (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
    Cape Coast Technical University)

  • I. N. Amanor

    (Cape Coast Technical University)

Abstract

Purpose: The paper was purposed to assess the perception of stakeholders in the coconut-cultivation industry involving farmers, drivers and retailers in the Abura/Asebu/Kwamankese district in the Central Region of Ghana in terms of the sources of post-harvest losses. Design/Methodology/Approach: Thirty farmers each were targeted as the study population in Abura, Asebu, and Kwamankese townships and their surrounding communities after a preliminary study of 5 farmers. The study employed both quantitative and qualitative data using a close- and open-ended questionnaire, interview and observation as research instruments. The purposive and snowball sampling methods were employed. Sixty farmers responded to the questionnaire at a response rate of 67%, while 9 drivers and 3 roadside retailers were interviewed. The IBM SPSS Statistics 20 software program was used for the data analysis employing descriptive analysis. Findings: The outcome of the study revealed that sources of post-harvest losses include loss arising from fresh fruit consumption; method of de-husking; processing and storage of copra. Others include losses arising from harvesting (early or late harvesting); collection and gathering; transportation drying of copra. The rest were losses that arise from seasoning; and insects, pests and fungi. Factors that contributed most to postharvest losses of coconut within the district were found to include copra drying (19.98%); processing (19.98%); storage of copra (18.6%); as well as insects, pests and fungi destruction (16.4%). The factor that contributed least was de-husking (2.8%). Postharvest losses among the respondents ranged between 5 and 25 % with an average value of 14.01% and a standard deviation of 4.2%. Research Limitation: The sample size was limited considering the population involved in the coconut industry in the district. The relationship between individual parameters could not be considered and analysed. Practical Implication: Kiln drying instead of sun-drying when extensively introduced could improve drying time and mold infestation thus reducing postharvest losses from this source. Application of weedicides to clear farms must be encouraged. Social Implication: The annual earnings of most of the farmers were below the standard poverty level. Poverty reduction interventions should be extended or intensified to the farmers since most of the contributing factors of post-harvest losses were due to poverty and lack of funds to deal with both basic human and industry needs. Education of farmers with regards to the application of technology such as the application of insecticides, pesticides and fungicides must be introduced. Originality/Value: The study established 10 sources of post-harvest losses of coconut in the district and as a case study for Ghana. Post-harvest losses of coconut could be reduced with the help of agronomic interventions from agricultural extension officers and institutional goodwill from the Ministry of Food and Agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Baffour-Awuah & N. Y. S. Sarpong & I. N. Amanor, 2023. "Post-harvest Losses of Coconut in Abura/asebu/kwamankese District, Central Region, Ghana," Springer Books, in: Clinton Aigbavboa & Joseph N. Mojekwu & Wellington Didibhuku Thwala & Lawrence Atepor & Emmanuel Adi (ed.), Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation, pages 589-602, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-25998-2_45
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25998-2_45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-25998-2_45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.