IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-25998-2_36.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Assessment of Climate Change Mitigation Strategies in Building Project Delivery Process

In: Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • A. Opawole

    (University of the Free State)

  • K. Kajimo-Shakantu

    (University of the Free State)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the climate change mitigating strategies adopted at the stages of the building project supply chain towards enhancing the sustainable construction process. Design/Methodology/Approach: Primary data used for the study were collected through questionnaires administered on 102 construction professionals comprising; architects, quantity surveyors, engineers, and builders in Lagos State, Nigeria. These are major construction professionals that represent various organizations in the supply chain of the building delivery process. Data retrieved were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings: Respondents indicated their opinion that the top four stages of the building project supply chain that contribute most to climate change ranked in the order of; the processing of raw materials with means score (MS = 4.14), extraction process (MS = 4.12), and transportation processes (MS = 3.83). The assembling process (MS = 3.40), maintenance operations (MS = 3.32), and other operations such as heating, lighting, etc. (MS = 3.26) were also significant on the scale of assessment used in the questionnaire but they stayed in the category of lesser ranked variables. Findings also indicated that mitigating strategies including waste reduction, waste re-use, and waste recycling (MS = 3.72), more efficient construction processes (MS = 3.62), use of sustainable building materials (MS = 3.59), increased use of local materials (MS = 3.59), were rated more important than those of retrofitting of existing buildings (MS = 3.16), carbon sequestration (MS = 3.03), and carbon mitigation offsets, emissions trading, and carbon tax (MS = 3.01). Research Limitations: A larger sample size and inclusion of case study projects could bring the findings to a broader perspective. Practical Implications: More awareness about climate change and its impact should be created by government and professional bodies through the regular advertisement, workshops and seminars to update the knowledge of clients and construction professionals. Social Implications: Government should enact laws that will regulate indiscriminate extraction of raw materials to minimize its contribution to climate change. Originality/Value: The study provided implications for climate change mitigating measures and sustainability in building project delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Opawole & K. Kajimo-Shakantu, 2023. "Assessment of Climate Change Mitigation Strategies in Building Project Delivery Process," Springer Books, in: Clinton Aigbavboa & Joseph N. Mojekwu & Wellington Didibhuku Thwala & Lawrence Atepor & Emmanuel Adi (ed.), Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation, pages 483-492, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-25998-2_36
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25998-2_36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-25998-2_36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.