IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-25998-2_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Innovation Performance and Efficiency of Research and Development Intensity as a Proportion of GDP: A Bibliometric Review

In: Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • S. N. Dorhetso

    (Accra Institute of Technology (AIT))

  • L. Y. Boakye

    (Accra Institute of Technology (AIT))

  • D. N. O. Welbeck

    (Accra Institute of Technology (AIT))

Abstract

Purpose: The resolution of this study was to conduct a bibliometric analysis of innovation performance and efficiency of research and development (R&D) expenditure as a proportion of gross domestic product (GDP), to estimate its relative effects on economic growth and productivity. Design/Methodology/Approach: Scopus database was the source of material collected to conduct this study. Selected keywords from literature were combined with Boolean operators and searched. Subsequently a rigorous screening procedure with an inclusion and exclusion criteria was adopted to select the relevant articles for the study. A four prong bibliometric analysis: co-authorship analysis; keyword co-occurrence analysis; bibliographic coupling; and co-citation analysis was then conducted. Findings: From the co-authorship analysis based on countries, the United states emerged with the highest number of documents, followed by China and the United Kingdom, with Italy in the third position. However, China had the greatest number of citations. South Africa, Nigeria and Ghana had 3,2 and 1 documents with 14, 20 and 5 citations respectively. From the results of the keyword co-occurrence analysis, it was observed that innovation, and research and development were the most dominant keywords that reoccurred, indicating that they were the topmost research hotspots. From the bibliographic coupling analysis, it was discovered that articles themed on innovation and R&D subsidies have clouded the research space of innovation performance and efficiency of R&D intensity as a proportion of GDP since 2007 till date. Implications/Research Limitation: It is expected that this study would significantly contribute to theoretical literature by providing a bibliometric record of innovation performance and efficiency of R&D intensity as a ratio of GDP. However, the study uses data from Scopus and limitations of the database have implications for the results. Also, although numerous manual screening criteria were set to filter documents, there may have been subjective bias. Practical Implication: Besides the theoretical contribution of this study, the results would also help governments to plan and instigate research that is geared towards national development. Originality/Value: This distinctive research conducted a bibliometric review of the performance of innovation and efficiency of R&D spending as a fraction of GDP, and corroborated a grave research field that is currently understudied.

Suggested Citation

  • S. N. Dorhetso & L. Y. Boakye & D. N. O. Welbeck, 2023. "Innovation Performance and Efficiency of Research and Development Intensity as a Proportion of GDP: A Bibliometric Review," Springer Books, in: Clinton Aigbavboa & Joseph N. Mojekwu & Wellington Didibhuku Thwala & Lawrence Atepor & Emmanuel Adi (ed.), Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation, pages 260-277, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-25998-2_20
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25998-2_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-25998-2_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.