IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-88516-8_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

I-deals: Not Ideal for Employee Diversity?

In: Idiosyncratic Deals at Work

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjeewa Perera

    (University of South Australia)

  • Yiqiong Li

    (University of Queensland)

Abstract

I-deals or individualized employment arrangements could potentially benefit both employees and organizations. I-deals are expected to particularly benefit employees from diverse demographic groups. Needs of these employees are often not met by “one-size-fits all” organizational practices that cater to the majority of the workforce. I-deals allow these employees access to work arrangements that suit their individual circumstances. They allow employers an opportunity to support these employees by taking their diverse needs into account. Thus, on paper, i-deals appear to be a win–win solution for both parties. However, i-deals can activate stereotypes and can influence managerial decision-making and co-worker reactions. These responses may influence employees’ decisions to apply for and negotiate i-deals and their ability to obtain and maintain i-deals. In this chapter, we focus on two groups of employees who are expected to benefit from i-deals: women and mature-age workers. Drawing on literature on i-deals, organizational justice, and workforce diversity, we highlight specific challenges faced by women and mature-age workers in negotiating and maintaining i-deals. We also identify organizational contexts that are likely to exacerbate these challenges. We conclude with recommendations for future research and practical implications for organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjeewa Perera & Yiqiong Li, 2022. "I-deals: Not Ideal for Employee Diversity?," Springer Books, in: Smriti Anand & Yasin Rofcanin (ed.), Idiosyncratic Deals at Work, chapter 0, pages 211-235, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-88516-8_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88516-8_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-88516-8_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.