IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-59886-0_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

EAEU Intra-Regional Trade

In: The Economic Dimension of Eurasian Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey N. Spartak

    (Russian Foreign Trade Academy of Ministry of Economic Development)

Abstract

The development of intra-regional trade and other forms of economic cooperation was initially defined as the most important task of creating the Customs Union (2010) and then the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU 2015). In the EAEU a common market for goods functions, although a number of sensitive exemptions and restrictions remain, while a common market for services is being formed. Mutual trade of EAEU countries is very highly concentrated on Russia, which strongly depends on the state of the Russian domestic market and the terms of Russian energy supplies to its EAEU partners. Smaller EAEU countries—Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, and Armenia—are most focused on mutual trade, while for Russia the role of trading partners in the EAEU is much lower. For the Union as a whole, the share of intra-regional trade in total foreign trade turnover is still very modest—12 to 14 per cent in the last decade—but for the participating countries, the quality of this trade is very important as, in contrast to supplies to third countries, a significantly larger share belongs to manufacturing products and the nomenclature of trade is much wider. There is a slight but steady increase in the role of mutual trade in meeting the internal demand of the EAEU in agricultural and industrial products. The low level of competitive regional supplies of technological goods and services, the weak development of intra-industry trade, large trade imbalances in favor of Russia, violations of the Customs Union rules by the parties, and the deviation of trade flows in favor of major non-regional players, primarily China and the EU, are all factors which have a restraining effect on mutual trade. The role of the integration factor in the development of intra-regional trade can be traced rather poorly, although some positive impact on trade took place in 2011–2013 with the emerging common market of goods, and for Armenia after joining the EAEU in 2015. Calculations based on the CGE-model predict the possibility of a significant increase in mutual trade in the case of the complete elimination of non-tariff barriers, as well as the stimulating effect on intra-regional trade in the case of Uzbekistan’s accession to the EAEU. The real prospects for a substantial expansion of trade within the EAEU are small, due to the existing restrictions and contradictions between partners, as well as due to the already existing phenomenon of overtrading in the EAEU region.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey N. Spartak, 2021. "EAEU Intra-Regional Trade," Springer Books, in: Natalia A. Piskulova (ed.), The Economic Dimension of Eurasian Integration, chapter 0, pages 27-66, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-59886-0_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59886-0_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Intra-regional/mutual trade; Common market; Non-tariff barriers; Intra-industry trade; Trade distortions; Trade potential; Trade deviation effects;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-59886-0_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.