IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-319-67603-6_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Evaluation of E-Service Quality in the Hotel Sector: A Systematic Literature Review

In: Innovative Approaches to Tourism and Leisure

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Kourtesopoulou

    (Open University of Cyprus
    University of Peloponnese)

  • John Kehagias

    (Open University of Cyprus)

  • Alkistis Papaioannou

    (University of Peloponnese)

Abstract

Background Delivering high quality e-services is a key strategy to achieve competitive advantage, due to its positive correlation with the increase of customers purchasing decisions. This systematic literature review attempts to develop a conceptual model of hotel’s e-service quality determinants by examining the different perspective of customers and professionals in the field of tourism. Methods Four sources were used to locate all relevant and eligible studies: specific electronic databases; existing related bibliography and meta-analyses; reference lists of the research papers; and indivisible search on indexes of journal articles in tourism industry. The results Only 66 studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected as primary studies, with a total number of 6162 evaluating hotels. The majority (38%), used as evaluators of hotel e-services users-customers and professionals (30%) in the tourism field. Only 32 studies included hotel customers as evaluators with previous online purchasing experience. Half of these indicated significant impacts of quality determinants on customer purchase intentions. Regarding user-customer approach, the most determinant factors of e-service quality were information quality (n = 23 studies), trust/security (n = 13) and the ease of use (n = 12). From the professional’s perspective, studies also recognized the importance of information quality (n = 19), customer orientation of the hotel website (n = 19), followed by the usefulness level (n = 16), and the communication channels (n = 16). Finally, major differences were identified based on hotel type (chain or independent), size (number of beds) and category. Hotel Chains and 4–5 stars hotels appeared to provide better e-marketing and customer relations strategies, greater level of technology and innovation application, greater value of entertainment and higher level of trust in their websites. Conclusions The research evidence provides valid information for hotels directing them to improve their website design, which corresponds to customer service quality perceptions and has a major contribution on customer experience in sourcing information or making an online purchase.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Kourtesopoulou & John Kehagias & Alkistis Papaioannou, 2018. "Evaluation of E-Service Quality in the Hotel Sector: A Systematic Literature Review," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Vicky Katsoni & Kathy Velander (ed.), Innovative Approaches to Tourism and Leisure, pages 173-191, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-67603-6_13
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67603-6_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eduard Cristobal-Fransi & Francisco Hernández-Soriano & Berta Ferrer-Rosell & Natalia Daries, 2019. "Exploring Service Quality among Online Sharing Economy Platforms from an Online Media Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Vivek Agrawal & Nitin Seth & Jitendra Kumar Dixit, 2022. "A combined AHP–TOPSIS–DEMATEL approach for evaluating success factors of e-service quality: an experience from Indian banking industry," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 715-747, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    E-services; Quality; Hotels; Evaluation; Quality determinants; Website;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L8 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • Z3 - Other Special Topics - - Tourism Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-67603-6_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.