IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/oprchp/978-3-319-00795-3_19.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Impact of Utility Function to Service Center Location in Public Service System

In: Operations Research Proceedings 2012

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Kohani

    (University of Zilina)

  • Lubos Buzna

    (University of Zilina)

  • Jaroslav Janacek

    (University of Zilina)

Abstract

Traditional approaches to the public service system design can be seen as a resource allocation problem with a central planner, where social costs are minimized. Even though all tax payers share the costs of the system construction and its operation, not all citizens have the same access to the service. There are two different ways of evaluating the resulting quality of the general system. The utilitarian approach prefers solutions which maximize the system utility. The fair approach, on the other hand, takes into account the preferences of individual users and their rights to have an equal access to the provided services. In this paper we focus on reformulation of the public service system design problem to the utility maximization problem, where both, the system and fair approaches will be studied. We evaluate the impact of the used utility functions on the location of service centres. We compare the distribution of located centres in comparison with other approaches, and we explore its impact on the price of fairness.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Kohani & Lubos Buzna & Jaroslav Janacek, 2014. "Impact of Utility Function to Service Center Location in Public Service System," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Stefan Helber & Michael Breitner & Daniel Rösch & Cornelia Schön & Johann-Matthias Graf von der Schu (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2012, edition 127, pages 129-134, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-319-00795-3_19
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00795-3_19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-319-00795-3_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.