IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/oprchp/978-3-030-48439-2_86.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Comparison of Forward and Closed-Loop Supply Chains

In: Operations Research Proceedings 2019

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Alegoz

    (Eskisehir Technical University)

  • Onur Kaya

    (Eskisehir Technical University)

  • Z. Pelin Bayindir

    (Middle East Technical University)

Abstract

Over the past years, closed-loop supply chains (CLSC) gained a considerable attention in both academia and industry due to environmental regulations and concerns about sustainability. Although various problems in CLSC’s are addressed by researchers, not much attention is given to the effects of closing the loop in supply chains. In this study, we propose a set of linear programming models for both forward and closed-loop supply chains to see the economic and environmental effects of closing the loop. In addition to the case where there is no emission regulation, we also study the carbon cap policy and compare the forward and closed-loop supply chains under this policy. Computational results bring two important insights to us. First, we see that there are instances in which closing the loop may bring significant cost and emission reductions. Second, we observe that it may be possible to work under lower carbon caps by closing the loop in supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Alegoz & Onur Kaya & Z. Pelin Bayindir, 2020. "A Comparison of Forward and Closed-Loop Supply Chains," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Janis S. Neufeld & Udo Buscher & Rainer Lasch & Dominik Möst & Jörn Schönberger (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2019, pages 707-714, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-030-48439-2_86
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-48439-2_86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-030-48439-2_86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.