IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-642-37021-2_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

ERP Clients: Browser-Based or Dedicated: Do We Need Both?—An Evaluation Based on User Perceptions

In: Innovation and Future of Enterprise Information Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Leyh

    (Dresden University of Technology)

  • Walter Heger

    (Dresden University of Technology)

Abstract

Due to recent technological developments, enabling mobility to users becomes more and more important for ERP manufacturers. With mobile devices employees can use their ERP applications on the road to take advantage of business capabilities. Here, “putting everything into the browser” is a challenge for ERP manufacturers. Additionally, the question arises whether to provide only one client—a browser-based one—or to still provide additionally a dedicated client? To gain first insight for answering this question, we measured the workload of selected ERP users by using NASA’s Task Load Index (TLX) while fulfilling tasks of a limited business scenario within a dedicated client and within a browser-based client. According to our results the workload for the dedicated client is lower whereas usability is rated higher with the browser-based client. Therefore, a browser-based client could be a good enhancement for ERP systems, but dedicated clients are still necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Leyh & Walter Heger, 2013. "ERP Clients: Browser-Based or Dedicated: Do We Need Both?—An Evaluation Based on User Perceptions," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Felix Piazolo & Michael Felderer (ed.), Innovation and Future of Enterprise Information Systems, edition 127, pages 71-86, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-642-37021-2_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37021-2_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-642-37021-2_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.