IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-1-4614-6058-9_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Conclusions and Recommendations: What Have We Learned?

In: Improving Risk Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Anthony Cox

    (Cox Associates)

Abstract

The discipline of risk analysis has become a crucial contributor to both public-sector and private-sector decisions with large stakes and uncertain outcomes. It informs and structures productive analysis and deliberation and provides needed information about the probable quantitative consequences of alternative courses of action. As we have seen, risk analysis is now used in applications as diverse and significant as medical decision-making (e.g., in Chaps. 1 and 2), community-based disaster risk management (Chap. 3), enterprise risk management (Chap. 4), homeland security and antiterrorism initiatives (Chap. 5), food and drug safety (Chap. 6), and public health and environmental and occupational exposure regulations (Chaps. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13).

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Anthony Cox, 2012. "Conclusions and Recommendations: What Have We Learned?," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Improving Risk Analysis, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 373-375, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-6058-9_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6058-9_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-6058-9_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.