IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isbchp/978-981-16-9579-7_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Eleven Theses on the Humanization of Development: ‘Praxis Philosophy’ in World of the Third

In: In Quest of Humane Development

Author

Listed:
  • Anup Dhar

    (Centre for Development Practice, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University Delhi)

  • Anjan Chakrabarti

    (University of Calcutta)

Abstract

This paper makes space for eleven possible moves to humanize development. The first is to turn to capabilities-functionings, quality of life and questions of well-being (in addition to ‘growth’). The second is a critique of the reduction of a part of humanity to the epithet underdeveloped and the consequent dehumanization. The third is a disaggregation of the map of the world into those that are ‘hooked to the circuits of global capital’ and those that are not and are outside (designated world of the third). The brunt of the cruelty of (capitalist) development projects is borne by the world of the third subjects. This paper is a critique of that inhumanity and an attention to the pain inflicted upon the world of the third. The fourth is a turn to those subject positions that constitute the world of the third. Such post-capitalist and post-Orientalist subject positions further humanize development. The fifth is a turn to the real human being; not data; not graphs; breathing, living human beings. The sixth is to re-establish a long lost real relationship with the ‘subaltern’. Not to study them; not to churn out papers on their miseries; but to relate to them and their miseries; to alleviate some of the social suffering, if possible. The seventh is a turn to being in the polis. Development Studies can perhaps be humanized only if it is singed in development practice, in transformative social praxis; i.e. if poverty is alleviated; not just studied. The eighth would be the displacement of ‘field work’ with immersion in subaltern life-worlds and worldviews, of research with action research, of theories of social suffering with practices of social healing. The ninth would be a turn to the Borromean Knot of knowing-being-doing. The tenth is a rewriting of politics as reconstruction and not just critique. The eleventh is a turn to praxis philosophy—a philosophy of not just being intelligent but about being good as well—where philosophy is not just a way of knowing but a dharma—a way of life and ethical living.

Suggested Citation

  • Anup Dhar & Anjan Chakrabarti, 2022. "Eleven Theses on the Humanization of Development: ‘Praxis Philosophy’ in World of the Third," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Byasdeb Dasgupta & Prasenjit Sarkhel & Archita Ghosh & Bishakha Ghosh (ed.), In Quest of Humane Development, chapter 0, pages 33-46, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-981-16-9579-7_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-9579-7_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Capabilities-functionings; World of the third; Immersion in the polis; Action research; Social healing; Praxis philosophy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • P10 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-981-16-9579-7_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.