IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isbchp/978-81-322-1545-5_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Measurement of Bank Efficiency: Analytical Methods

In: Deregulation and Efficiency of Indian Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Sunil Kumar

    (South Asian University)

  • Rachita Gulati

    (Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee)

Abstract

This chapter aims to provide a review of various analytical methods which are being used by the researchers to measure bank efficiency. We note that the frontier efficiency measurement methods made the traditional financial accounting ratios’ analysis completely obsolete and out-dated. The careful analysis of literature on frontier approaches of bank efficiency highlights that Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) are the predominant approaches that have attracted many empirical studies. Both the approaches have their distinct advantages and disadvantages. DEA has an advantage of computing efficiency scores in multiple-inputs and multiple-outputs production setting without specifying any functional form and distribution of the inefficiency term, but makes no room for noise and lacks hypothesis testing. On the other hand, though the efficiency estimates from SFA accommodate the noise, yet these estimates are very sensitive to the choice of functional form and distribution of the inefficiency term. However, no agreement has been reached on the superiority of one method over the others, and choice of a particular method is primarily guided by the data considerations and an individual preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunil Kumar & Rachita Gulati, 2014. "Measurement of Bank Efficiency: Analytical Methods," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Deregulation and Efficiency of Indian Banks, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 49-117, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-81-322-1545-5_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1545-5_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-81-322-1545-5_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.