IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/inschp/978-3-031-49196-2_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Engineering Is Not Entrepreneurship

In: Moonshots and the New Industrial Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Randall G. Holcombe

    (Florida State University)

Abstract

The idea of mission-oriented government, or entrepreneurial government, has been supported using examples of successful government programs such as the Manhattan project or the Apollo program. These are examples of engineering successes, but they were not entrepreneurial. Entrepreneurship consists of producing innovations that produce more value than they cost, and in those examples there was no attempt to compare benefits to costs. A realistic view of the political process under which government actually operates shows that attempts to make government more entrepreneurial will result in programs with vague goals and no clear indicators of success. Voters like feel-good aspirations, and politicians like to propose programs that appeal to voters. The real entrepreneurs in the political process are lobbyists and interest groups who find opportunities for rent seeking and regulatory capture, reducing the efficiency of government. With sufficient resources, governments can produce engineering successes, but the political process works against governments being entrepreneurial. Engineering is not entrepreneurship.

Suggested Citation

  • Randall G. Holcombe, 2024. "Engineering Is Not Entrepreneurship," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Magnus Henrekson & Christian Sandström & Mikael Stenkula (ed.), Moonshots and the New Industrial Policy, pages 43-60, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:inschp:978-3-031-49196-2_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-49196-2_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:inschp:978-3-031-49196-2_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.