IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/inschp/978-3-030-94273-1_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Evaluating Evaluations of Innovation Policy: Exploring Reliability, Methods, and Conflicts of Interest

In: Questioning the Entrepreneurial State

Author

Listed:
  • Elias Collin

    (School of Economics and Management, Lund University)

  • Christian Sandström

    (Jönköping International Business School
    The Ratio Institute)

  • Karl Wennberg

    (Stockholm School of Economics)

Abstract

Expansions of innovation policies have been paralleled with an increase in the evaluations of such policies. Yet, there are few systematic evaluations of how such evaluations are conducted, by whom, and their overall conclusions. We analyze 110 evaluations of innovation policy in Sweden from 2005 to 2019. Our findings show that the majority of these evaluations are positive, about one-third are neutral in their conclusions, and very few are negative. The majority of evaluations were conducted by consulting firms, close to one-third by expert government agencies, and around 10% by university researchers or as self-evaluations by the governmental agencies responsible for the policy themselves. Few evaluations employed causal methods to assess the potential effects of policies. We discuss conflicts of interest and question the reliability of evaluations of innovation policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Elias Collin & Christian Sandström & Karl Wennberg, 2022. "Evaluating Evaluations of Innovation Policy: Exploring Reliability, Methods, and Conflicts of Interest," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Karl Wennberg & Christian Sandström (ed.), Questioning the Entrepreneurial State, pages 157-173, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:inschp:978-3-030-94273-1_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-94273-1_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Büchele, Stefan & Bünstorf, Guido & Cantner, Uwe & Dreier, Lukas & Meurer, Petra & Neumann, Liam Paul, 2024. "Commissioned project evaluations of research and innovation policy in Germany: A review," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 11-2024, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:inschp:978-3-030-94273-1_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.