IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/inschp/978-3-030-62962-5_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Postscript: Creating and Managing a University-Based Incubator

In: Creating Communities of Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Oswald Jones

    (University of Liverpool)

  • PingPing Meckel

    (University of Central Lancashire)

  • David Taylor

    (Manchester Metropolitan University)

Abstract

This study addresses a research gap by focusing on incubatees located in a UK university-based incubator. INNOSPACE provided the case study for this book and falls between a non-profit incubator and an academic incubator on the continuum developed by Allen and McCluskey (1990). The overall aim was to help university students and graduates start new businesses with a view to creating jobs and enhancing the local economy. The set-up funding for INNOSPACE was provided by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), Manchester Metropolitan University Business School (MMUBS), and the Centre for Enterprise (CfE). A large office space provided by MMUBS was under-utilised before INNOSPACE was established. During the first operational year, management charged incubatees a rent well below market price. Before the ERDF funding was due to run out, the management team was thinking of ways of sustaining INNOSPACE financially. After funding the first year, the University agreed to continue to provide the office facilities but insisted that the management team had to be supported through rental income. Consequently, a tiered rent system was introduced depending on the facilities incubatees wanted (or could afford) to access. The rental packages ranged from postal address only with no other administrative support, hot-desking, a dedicated desk, and a dedicated office on a different floor (rent depending on size of office). Because of the benefits provided to incubatees and the increasing number of tenants, it was possible to increase the overall rent substantially and the incubator became partially financially self-sustaining financially and independent of MMUBS and the CfE. INNOSPACE fits with Todorovic and Moenter’s (2010: 28) definition of a university incubator:INNOSPACE regularly had student visitors from MMUBS and other University departments who had studied or were studying subjects related to entrepreneurship or small firms. Some incubatees offered work experience to students. For example, Jamie Bettles (Sect. 10.6) saw the on-campus location as a platform for collaboration and recruitment (including opportunities for placements, internships, student-led consultancy projects, and part-time and full-time employment). In a sense, the incubator complemented existing educational programmes. The University and the CfE promoted INNOSPACE to students and encouraged them to turn their ideas into real businesses. Hence, MMU students had the opportunity to test out their ideas before or after graduation. When setting up and running INNOSPACE, academics and managers from various MMU Faculties, who were interested in supporting entrepreneurship, were invited to join the Steering Group, which we discuss in more detail below. In addition, most of the business advisors were associated with business support organisations such as Blue Orchid and Winning Pitch, which exposed incubatees to mentors with long experience of supporting new businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Oswald Jones & PingPing Meckel & David Taylor, 2021. "Postscript: Creating and Managing a University-Based Incubator," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Creating Communities of Practice, chapter 0, pages 211-232, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:inschp:978-3-030-62962-5_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62962-5_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:inschp:978-3-030-62962-5_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.