IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/innchp/978-3-319-05651-7_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Comparative Analysis of Career Growth Models in R&D Organizations

In: Technology Development

Author

Listed:
  • Sowmini Sengupta

    (Intel Corporation)

  • Jorge Garcia

    (Intel Corporation)

  • Nayem Rahman

    (Intel Corporation)

  • Daria Spatar

    (Portland State University)

Abstract

Firms that invest in developing cutting-edge technologies rely on leading technology practitioners to make innovations happen. These technology practitioners grow in their domain through continued discoveries which results in recognition of their work assessed through peer evaluations. These professional recognitions need to then translate into career growth for the practitioner within the firm in order for them to feel that their contributions are also valued by the company. Retaining technical talent is critical for the company in not only leveraging the skills of these individuals to achieve the company’s goals but these technology practitioners also serve as role models for other, newer members in the firm. This study analyses the various models that companies use to manage the career growth of these critical individuals. The study found four predominant career models from studying literature as well as in practice. Using this information, the study then selected five companies in various leading technical fields to understand their approach to technical career growth. Their characteristics such as size of the company, research investment, etc. and predominant career growth ladders were compared and contrasted. This study gives managers of leading technology firms some rich information on managing the individuals in their organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Sowmini Sengupta & Jorge Garcia & Nayem Rahman & Daria Spatar, 2014. "A Comparative Analysis of Career Growth Models in R&D Organizations," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Tugrul U. Daim & Ramin Neshati & Russell Watt & James Eastham (ed.), Technology Development, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 233-249, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-05651-7_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05651-7_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-05651-7_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.