IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/crechp/978-981-10-6478-4_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Human and Nature Revisited: The Industrial Revolution, Modern Economics and the Anthropocene

In: The Kyoto Manifesto for Global Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Ryuichi Fukuhara

    (Doshisha University)

Abstract

The Aral Sea disappeared due to overuse of water to cultivate cotton, causing the largest-scale environmental catastrophe in the 20th century. Taking cotton as an example, this chapter aims at revisiting the interrelationship between human and nature, collapse of which is a great concern of our society. The modern economics have regarded nature just as an endowed “bundle of resources”, and this perspective may have contributed to the socio-economic prosperity in part at the unprecedented level in the human history while the accumulative negative impacts on the environment since the Industrial Revolution disrupt the Earth system in whole, leading to the new geological era, the Anthropocene in the Earth history. Then, cotton played a decisive role in the Industrial Revolution, and its industrialized production and associated market system drastically changed the relationship between human and nature, and thus denaturalized our economy. The changes of the Earth system, represented by climate change, imply that the natural condition the modern economic paradigm has assumed as “given” for more than two centuries may be no longer granted. In our Kyoto Manifesto context, a view of nature and human expressed by a Japanese painter in the 18th century in Kyoto, provide a way from where we relink with nature and adopt ourselves to the coming Anthropocene.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryuichi Fukuhara, 2018. "Human and Nature Revisited: The Industrial Revolution, Modern Economics and the Anthropocene," Creative Economy, in: Stomu Yamash’ta & Tadashi Yagi & Stephen Hill (ed.), The Kyoto Manifesto for Global Economics, chapter 0, pages 35-62, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:crechp:978-981-10-6478-4_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6478-4_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lissy Fehnker & Diane Pearson & Peter Howland, 2022. "Informing Future Land Systems Using Self-Reported Pathways and Barriers to Connections to Nature: A Case Study in Auckland, New Zealand," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:crechp:978-981-10-6478-4_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.