IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/conchp/978-3-031-48735-4_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Enhancing Urban Solid Waste Management Through an Integrated Geographic Information System and Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study in Postwar Reconstruction

In: Handbook on Post-War Reconstruction and Development Economics of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Dudar

    (Vinnytsia National Technical University)

  • Olha Yavorovska

    (Vinnytsia National Technical University)

  • Giuseppe T. Cirella

    (University of Gdansk)

  • Volodymyr Buha

    (Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs)

  • Maryna Kuznetsova

    (Sumy National Agrarian University)

  • Iuliia Iarmolenko

    (Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University)

  • Olexander Svitlychnyy

    (National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine)

  • Liliia Pankova

    (National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine)

  • Svitlana Diachenko

    (National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine)

Abstract

This chapter developed a geographic information system (GIS) model and applied spatial analysis techniques to determine the most suitable location for municipal solid waste transfer station within the city of Vinnytsia, Ukraine. The absence of such a station within the city’s sanitation infrastructure gives rise to numerous challenges, leading to an overall decreased efficiency in waste management. With the rising costs associated with solid waste management, the importance of optimizing processes during the transportation stage has become increasingly evident. This issue is particularly significant in rapidly growing urban areas. Given the intricate hierarchical nature of waste management systems, the process of site selection requires a thorough examination of various alternative solutions and assessment criteria. Drawing on the conditions of the study area, a thorough look at the relevant factors and established criteria weights was examined using multicriteria decision analysis. A hierarchical model was then constructed to address the challenge of determining the optimal site for a waste transfer station in the city using spatial data. The creation of suitability maps for the geographical area was undertaken based on a range of criteria. These criteria were assessed on a scale from 1 (i.e., lowest suitability) to 5 (i.e., highest suitability), utilizing spatial information technologies. The potential sites for consideration were categorized using the best-worst method: “optimal,” “favorable,” and “unsuitable.” Optimal sites represent the most advantageous choices, while favorable sites could serve as backup options for potential candidates. This information possesses practical value for individuals responsible for making managerial decisions in the context of municipal solid waste management in urban areas marked by significant urbanization. Moreover, the model serves as a demonstrative example of infrastructure development and nation building, an important consideration for the country in the postwar reconstruction period.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Dudar & Olha Yavorovska & Giuseppe T. Cirella & Volodymyr Buha & Maryna Kuznetsova & Iuliia Iarmolenko & Olexander Svitlychnyy & Liliia Pankova & Svitlana Diachenko, 2024. "Enhancing Urban Solid Waste Management Through an Integrated Geographic Information System and Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study in Postwar Reconstruction," Contributions to Economics, in: Giuseppe T. Cirella (ed.), Handbook on Post-War Reconstruction and Development Economics of Ukraine, chapter 0, pages 377-392, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-031-48735-4_21
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-48735-4_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-031-48735-4_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.