IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/aaechp/978-3-031-52677-0_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Gains and Pains of the Energy Transition: A Perspective on Sub-Saharan Africa

In: Energy Regulation in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Ishmael Ackah

    (Public Utilities Regulatory Commission)

  • Rexford Kweku Asiama

    (University of Environment and Sustainable Development, Somanya)

  • Albert Okanto Ohene

    (Electricity Company of Ghana Limited)

  • Vida Aba Essuman

    (Meinergy Technology Limited)

  • Maame Esi Eshun

    (Public Utilities Regulatory Commission)

  • Charles Owusu

    (Petroleum Hub Development Corporation)

  • Patrick Nyarko

    (Petroleum Hub Development Corporation)

Abstract

One in three Africans do not have access to electricity. In most places where lights are available, the power supply is either unstable or not affordable. The penultimate energy policy of an African government is therefore to address the challenges of access, reliability, and affordability by transitioning to cheaper, low-carbon-emitting, and renewable energy sources. These, in turn, are expected to help reduce poverty and inequality. The African continent, however, does not live in isolation. Africa has contributed to climate change, though marginally, and is being affected by same. This has led to the development of policies and programs to reduce energy-related carbon emissions, among other strategies. While this will contribute to reducing emissions, enhancing the diversity of energy sources, promoting energy security, and creating employment in the clean technology sector, there could be challenges with stranded assets, loss of petroleum revenues, and petroleum jobs. How can countries in Sub-Saharan Africa take advantage of the opportunities offered by the energy transition while minimizing the negative impact on their economies? This paper attempts to offer some recommendations. An analysis of energy policy and related documents relevant to Africa’s energy transition, as well as statistical energy databases were reviewed and applied in this study. Drawing from existing literature, the paper interrogates the gains and pains of the energy transition, and how countries in Sub-Saharan Africa can take advantage of the opportunities offered by the energy transition while minimizing the negative impact on their economies. The study reveals that while funding for renewable energy, energy efficiency, and clean cooking in Africa has been sourced from public, private, and development partners in the past, the dynamics are changing. Africa needs to be part of the value chain, and not a mere consumer of technologies. With reserves in resources required for the energy transition, steps should be taken to start building industries around these resources. A combination of gas-fired thermal plants, hydro, solar, concentrated solar power, and wind can serve Africa’s energy needs. African countries should target renewable energy deployment, for instance, grid solar solution for rural and residential urban areas, natural gas for industry and industrial heating, and hydro as a baseload, in addition to natural gas which has many applications beyond power generation. The review offered an assessment on why Africa needs a unique energy transition path, and how energy sector governance and investment financing of renewables on the continent can foster an effective energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishmael Ackah & Rexford Kweku Asiama & Albert Okanto Ohene & Vida Aba Essuman & Maame Esi Eshun & Charles Owusu & Patrick Nyarko, 2024. "The Gains and Pains of the Energy Transition: A Perspective on Sub-Saharan Africa," Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development, in: Ishmael Ackah & Charly Gatete (ed.), Energy Regulation in Africa, pages 453-472, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aaechp:978-3-031-52677-0_20
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-52677-0_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aaechp:978-3-031-52677-0_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.