Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this book chapter or follow this series

Introduction to Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More
[Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More]

Contents:

Author Info

  • Derek Bok

    (Harvard University)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Drawing on a large body of empirical evidence, former Harvard President Derek Bok examines how much progress college students actually make toward widely accepted goals of undergraduate education. His conclusions are sobering. Although most students make gains in many important respects, they improve much less than they should in such important areas as writing, critical thinking, quantitative skills, and moral reasoning. Large majorities of college seniors do not feel that they have made substantial progress in speaking a foreign language, acquiring cultural and aesthetic interests, or learning what they need to know to become active and informed citizens. Overall, despite their vastly increased resources, more powerful technology, and hundreds of new courses, colleges cannot be confident that students are learning more than they did fifty years ago. Looking further, Bok finds that many important college courses are left to the least experienced teachers and that most professors continue to teach in ways that have proven to be less effective than other available methods. In reviewing their educational programs, however, faculties typically ignore this evidence. Instead, they spend most of their time discussing what courses to require, although the lasting impact of college will almost certainly depend much more on how the courses are taught. In his final chapter, Bok describes the changes that faculties and academic leaders can make to help students accomplish more. Without ignoring the contributions that America's colleges have made, Bok delivers a powerful critique--one that educators will ignore at their peril. Classification-JEL:

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i8648.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i8648.html
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    as in new window

    This chapter was published in: Derek Bok , , pages , 2007.

    This item is provided by Princeton University Press in its series Introductory Chapters with number 8648-1.

    Handle: RePEc:pup:chapts:8648-1

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://press.princeton.edu

    Related research

    Keywords: undergraduate education; college students; faculties; writing; critical thinking; quantitative skills; moral reasoning;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pup:chapts:8648-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Webmaster).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.